2666 by Roberto Bolaño
Friday, October 9th, 2009 Check the catalog for this item.
Roberto Bolaño’s 2666 comprises five distinct but intertwined parts: the story of four European literature scholars of a world-renowned, reclusive German writer, and the mystery of his identity; a Mexican scholar who hosts the four European scholars’ stay in Mexico; the story of the writer himself; that of a black American sports journalist, assigned to a boxing match in Northern Mexico, whose work leads him to investigate a years-long string of unsolved murders; and the story of the crimes, of the hundreds of inexplicably murdered women and girls in Santa Teresa (allegorical and perhaps merciful stand-in for the actual city and crimes of Juarez, Mexico), most of whom worked in U.S. and Canadian-owned maquilas and sweatshops that employ most of the city’s poor.
“The Part about the Crimes” is a nearly 250 page list of the women killed, the states in which they were found, the men brought to justice–sometimes unjustly–for their deaths, as well as all efforts political, journalistic, judicial, legal and extra-legal to stop the crimes or, at least, silence the public’s outrage. Its style differs completely from the rest of the book; in its delivery, it is dry, reportorial, almost repetitively laconic, and humorless. And it is harrowing.
The girl’s body turned up in a vacant lot in Colonia Las Flores. She was dressed in a white long-sleeved T-shirt and a yellow knee-length skirt, a size too big. Some children playing in the lot found her and told their parents. One of the mothers called the police, who showed up half an hour later. The lot was bordered by Calle Peláez and Calle Hermanos Chacón and it ended in a ditch behind which rose the walls of an abandoned dairy in ruins. There was no one around, which at first made the policemen think it was a joke. Nevertheless, they pulled up on Calle Peláez and one of them made his way into the lot. Soon he came across two women with their heads covered, kneeling in the weeds, praying. Seen from a distance, the women looked old, but they weren’t. Before them lay the body. Without interrupting, the policeman went back the way he’d come and motioned to his partner, who was waiting for him in the car, smoking. Then the two of them returned (the one who’d waited in the car had his gun in his hand) to the place where the women were kneeling and they stood there beside them staring at the body. The policeman with the gun asked whether they knew her. No, sir, said one of the women. We’ve never seen her before. She isn’t from around here, poor thing.
This happened 1993. January 1993. From then on, the killings of women began to be counted.
On the other hand,”The Part About Archimboldi” (The Writer), accounts the almost magical story of a boy obsessed by deep-sea life, who comes of age serving as German infantry in World War II, and becomes the writer whose life ties the rest of 2666’s parts together. Take this passage, for example, which echoes the Italian surrealist/magical realist Italo Calvino:
When his one-eyed mother bathed him in a washtub, the child Hans Reiter always slipped from her soapy hands and sank to the bottom, with his eyes open, and if her hands hadn’t lifted him back up to the surface he would have stayed there, contemplating the black wood and the black water where little particles of his own filth floated, tiny bits of skin that traveled like submarines toward an inlet the size of aneye, a calm, dark cove, although there was no calm, and all that existed was movement, which is the mask of many things, calm among them.
Bolaño’s prose throughout is stunning, and The Crimes’ dryness only seems to magnify this impression. The book, in both Parts about the Critic[s] and the Part about the Crimes, evoke a feeling of intangible helplessness, of a fear whose nature is impalpable and ineffable, like impression of a bad dream lost upon waking. 2666 is a massive 900 pages long, and tries the reader’s patience at times during the Part about the Crimes, but is also an unmistakably special novel, as shown by both critical response to it and the author’s struggling with its presentation up until his death.